Basic "What am I doing wrong?" question (Tuple argument to spawn? Dead pid intead of a runtime error?)
Jonathan Coupe
jonathan@REDACTED
Fri Feb 14 18:50:00 CET 2003
I've been spending a mostly pleasant day working through Concurrent
Programming in Erlang, and everything made sense... Until I wrote one of
those horrible programs that you often write while learning a new language,
one that seems to follow every rule you've learned and doesn't provoke as
much as a warning from the compiler, but still doesn't work. And of course
it's almost identical to one that *does* work.
It's a simple variant on progarm 5.2 from Concurrent Programming. The change
is that a tuple is used to contain both the value for the counter and a
name - oh, and I'm registering the counter under that name. An almost
identical program using two separate variables instead the tuple works, this
one doesn't. Instead, start/1 - and spawn - seems to return a pid to a dead
thread. (As far as can tell from the debugger, process_info, and whereis.)
Could someone explain what I've missed, and what behaviour I'm really seeing
here? And why I'm not getting a runtime error?
Thanks
- Jonathan Coupe
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
-module(ctr).
-export([start/1, loop/1, increment/1, value/1, name/1, stop/1]).
start(Name) ->
Pid = spawn(counter, loop, [{Name, 0}]),
register(Name, Pid),
Pid.
increment(Pid) ->
Pid ! increment.
value(Pid) ->
Pid ! {self(), value},
receive
{Pid, Value} ->
Value
end.
name(Pid) ->
Pid ! {self(), name},
receive
{Pid, Name} ->
Name
end.
stop(Pid) ->
Pid ! stop.
loop({Name,Value}) ->
receive
increment ->
loop({Name, Value+1});
{From, value} ->
From ! {self(), Value},
loop({Name, Value});
{From, name} ->
From ! {self(), Name},
loop({Name, Value});
stop ->
true;
Other ->
loop({Name, Value})
end.
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list