Structs (was RE: Record selectors)
Shawn Pearce
spearce@REDACTED
Thu Feb 13 07:39:20 CET 2003
Chris Pressey <cpressey@REDACTED> wrote:
> In fact, I think structs might have an advantage of being defined with
> funs. Erlang grew up with callback modules, but consider a 'lambda
> module' which is just a dictionary of funs. Instead of being named
> functions, they have keys that are each an atom. The advantage over a
> regular module is that the lambda module can have a higher order -
> constants can be curried into the funs.
Great idea, but does code reloading work with already
existing funs? :-)
--
Shawn.
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list