records generated from UBF
Vlad Dumitrescu
vlad_dumitrescu@REDACTED
Tue Apr 15 13:16:19 CEST 2003
>From: Ulf Wiger <etxuwig@REDACTED>
>
>Thus, the contract checker depends on UBF(B), the type
>definitions, and UBF(C), the state machine specification,
>but not on UBF(A), the encode/decode scheme.
>
>One could most likely design a UBFish gen_server that
>implements the UBF contract checking, but skips the
>encode/decode part.
Yes, of course, that's what I meant. I keep thinking of UBF as UBF(A),
because (B) and (C) are really very weakly connected to it - any encoding
would do.
regards,
Vlad
_________________________________________________________________
Hitta rätt på nätet med MSN Sök http://search.msn.se/
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list