Hmm,
suspected that but was unsure.
Thanks for pointing it out.
Is this version of the patch better ?
Is there be a new patch release of R8B scheduled ?
/Per
> Thanks for the bug report and patch.
>
> Note that there are similar problems for other boxed data types,
such as bignums,
> which your patch doesn't address.
>
> We include corrections for this problem in the next patch release
> of R8B.
>
> /Bjorn
>
> Per Bergqvist <per@REDACTED> writes:
>
> > And here is the patch to fix it ...
> >
> > /Per
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > the attached piece of code expose a rather serious bug in R8B-0.
> > (core
> > > dump).
> >
>
> --
> Björn Gustavsson Ericsson Utvecklings AB
> bjorn@REDACTED ÄT2/UAB/F/P
> BOX 1505
> +46 8 727 56 87 125 25 Älvsjö
>
=========================================================
Per Bergqvist
Synapse Systems AB
Phone: +46 709 686 685
Email: per@REDACTED
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: erl_db_util_patch_better
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 767 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20020306/49974c0a/attachment.obj>