[eeps] New - EEP 44: Additional preprocessor directives

[Robert Virding]

A minor question: why is it -if and -elif and not -if() and -elif() so it
is consistent with -ifdef()?

Robert


On 16 October 2015 at 12:25, Björn Gustavsson <bjorn@REDACTED> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Raimo Niskanen
> <raimo+eeps@REDACTED> wrote:
> > New - EEP 44: Additional preprocessor directives
> >
>
> I have posted a new draft of the EEP and sent
> a email to erlang-questions. Please keep further
> discussion about the EEP in the thread in
> erlang-questions.
>
> Here is a list of the major changes in draft 2:
>
> * version(App) now returns a list instead of a tuple.
>
> * The is_module/1 built-in has been clarified.
>
> * The rules for expressions in -if/-elif have been changed and clarified.
>
> * There is a new -warning directive.
>
> * There is a new -if/-elif built-in function: is_deprecated/3.
>
> * There is a new section about backwards compatibility.
>
> * Miscellaneous minor corrections and clarifications.
>
> /Björn
>
> --
> Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> _______________________________________________
> eeps mailing list
> eeps@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/eeps/attachments/20151017/f7075700/attachment.htm>