delayed child restart with incremental back-off

Fred Hebert mononcqc@REDACTED
Mon May 10 19:56:32 CEST 2021

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:27 AM Sean Hinde <sean.hinde@REDACTED> wrote:

> The current self() ! finish_startup recommendation drops all the startup
> ordering and failure recovery synchronisation on the programmer, and that
> is hard to get right.

These aren't current anymore. There is now a 'continue' return option with
a 'handle_continue' handler just for that: -- do
note that gen_statem doesn't require it because the whole FSM mechanism has
even more powerful general mechanisms for that kind of thing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list