Non-unique process names in observer

[Nathan Long]

I missed this thread and started trying to implement this myself, but
you've gotten further, so I'll leave it to you. I agree that the proc_lib
piece is by far the hardest, and I think it's a clever idea to put that off
and see if the idea gains enough momentum to have more explicit support.

Thanks for working on this! I'm excited to see how it goes.

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 4:55 AM Roger Lipscombe <roger@REDACTED>
wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 13:13, Roger Lipscombe <roger@REDACTED>
> wrote:
> [snip]
> > Lukas pointed out that adding more information to the PID term was a
> > lot of work, but suggested extending proc_lib to add further metadata
> > that could be displayed by observer.
>
> [snip]
> > In the short term, I think the easiest option might be to make the
> > changes to observer, document it appropriately, and then just
> > encourage library authors to put('$process_label', MyLabel) wherever
> > it seems sensible.
>
> https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/5039
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20210730/556f8e54/attachment.htm>