[erlang-questions] Internal compiler atoms
Tue Aug 1 15:11:13 CEST 2017
Anthony Ramine writes:
> > Le 28 juil. 2017 à 08:43, Albin Stigö <> a écrit :
> > 4. If you really DO need to create dynamic atoms for a quick and dirty
> > hack, keep in mind that atoms with a common prefix ie. foo_1, foo_2,
> > foo_3 etc will lead worse performance because of how erlang compares
> > atoms (some Erlang guru correct me if I'm wrong but this used to be
> > the case).
> Wrong, atom comparison is always O(1).
Equality/inequality tests on atoms is O(1). (That's the whole point of atoms,
and their analogues in LISP, i.e. "symbols".)
Comparisons (<, >, etc) is O(length(atom_to_list(Atom)), and with
common prefixes the cost is indeed higher.
More information about the erlang-questions