[erlang-questions] Is it a compiler bug?

Dmytro Lytovchenko dmytro.lytovchenko@REDACTED
Thu Apr 13 16:43:14 CEST 2017

I can see how enforcing parentheses in map()map() syntax can be useful.
A compiler warning would be awesome here. Also this is a nice thing for
Elvis style checker to do, but when it comes to running Elvis, your program
should already be correct — so that is too late.

In variable()map() syntax there is no confusion so that is fine.

2017-04-13 16:14 GMT+02:00 Jesper Louis Andersen <

> No, it is not stupidity in any way.
> People hit this now and again. It makes sense to solve the problem this
> way. I remember we considered the alternative, which is to reject the
> notion, but this requires some special-handling in the compiler and isn't
> clear-cut either.
> In short, regarding this as an invalid expression is to a certain extent
> possible, and certainly desirable. But we run into subtle problems when we
> want to reject it too, which is what complicates matters.
> I think it is healthy to challenge certain design decisions in Erlang,
> especially because dynamically typed languages tend to have corner cases in
> their semantics which are hard to handle in general.
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:04 PM Minin Maxim <Maxim.Minin@REDACTED>
> wrote:
>> I'm so stupid today J
>> Thanks guys (Robert & Stanislaw)
>> Cheers
>> Maxim
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20170413/3dd7763f/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list