[erlang-questions] Erlang documentation -- a modest proposal

Robert Virding <>
Sat Sep 24 19:50:12 CEST 2016

On 23 September 2016 at 11:17, Loïc Hoguin <> wrote:

> On 09/23/2016 10:36 AM, Lutz Behnke wrote:
>> I would propose a position specific to the reference documentation:
>> 8) Put the documentation in the source code. Use edoc (or similar new
>> tool).
> And I would strongly advise against that.
I definitely agree with Loïc here but from the programmers viewpoint. When
working with the code I need (good) documentation which describes what the
code is doing from the internal POV. I definitely DON'T need documentation
for the user on how to use and what it means and examples and ... . That
just clutters up the page for me writing/maintaining the code.

Note that I am NOT saying the user doesn't need all that, the user
definitely does need/require all that, but it should be somewhere else not
mixed in with the code.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160924/8fc9733e/attachment.html>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list