[erlang-questions] Quickcheck'ing a protocol

Pierre Fenoll <>
Thu Sep 22 07:57:58 CEST 2016


Have you tried using PropEr / Quickcheck statem?
http://proper.softlab.ntua.gr/Tutorials/PropEr_testing_of_finite_state_machines.html
PropEr is free & open source & I use it to quickcheck RESTfull APIs.



Cheers,
-- 
Pierre Fenoll


On 22 September 2016 at 05:45, Josh Adams <> wrote:

> So I've been frustrated lately by the fact that Slack's IRC gateway isn't
> RFC 2812 compliant (https://github.com/bitwalker/exirc/issues/51)
>
> In dealing with this I wondered why the crap they needed an engineer to go
> through the spec as a result of their server's response to figure out that
> this was an issue (they've added it to their bug tracker, so I have some
> amount of faith it might get fixed eventually - for now I'll paper over the
> issue in the client which reduces the stress on them to actually fix it
> though).
>
> Should RFCs / protocols of this nature just come with something like a
> quickcheck model for their spec?  Is anyone aware of prior art around this
> sort of thing aside from Quvic/Volvo that I could draw from if I wanted to
> fiddle in this arena?
>
> I'd think that the ideal situation involves an open source quickcheck
> implementation to test a given protocol implementation against at least
> some of the RFC, and a means to run the tests against potential
> servers/clients, with badges potentially showing the percentage of the test
> that passes.  This would allow economics to drive spec implementers towards
> correctness, which would save countless engineer-hours spent figuring out
> why the damn clients can't talk to the damn servers for a given spec.
>
> Thoughts?  Pipe dream?  "Silly child, see A, B, and C for the many people
> who are already doing this?"
>
> --
> Josh Adams
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160922/a7cfc514/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list