Mon Sep 19 18:28:59 CEST 2016
My flabber is gasted.
I read what I assumed the posts that you referred to and am truly
I could not detect anything that I construed as either aggressive
I remain very puzzled.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:05 AM, <> wrote:
> I have been taken to task in private e-mail by someone
> who detected in my response to the "list comprehension puzzle"
> both "aggressive sarcasm" and "undisguised contempt".
> In all honesty, no sarcasm was intended. (A sarcastic response
> would not have pointed to the Erlang reference manual.) Nor
> was any contempt whatsoever involved. I should not have to
> reassure long-term readers of this mailing list that these
> attitudes my critic claimed to detect were entirely imaginary.
> However, it shows that it was possible for people to misread
> what I wrote. If anyone took offence at the message I
> *meant* to be helpful, please accept my assurance that no
> offence was intended and my unreserved apology for the offence.
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions