[erlang-questions] Why do "interface to language X" projects all seem to die out?

David Leach <>
Thu Sep 1 01:22:00 CEST 2016


We use erlport in production quite successfully, although we'd also like the map feature we haven't had any major issues with it.


So although there may be little activity it does what it says it does.

________________________________
From:  <> on behalf of Garrett Smith <>
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 6:55 a.m.
To: Michael Truog
Cc: Erlang Questions
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Why do "interface to language X" projects all seem to die out?

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Michael Truog <> wrote:
> On 08/31/2016 08:50 AM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>>
> Based on https://github.com/hdima/erlport/issues/15 erlport isn't accepting

> changes and is dead.

There aren't many Erlang projects that don't have a bus count of ~ 1 :)

Nonetheless this is a very impressive project and its patterns can be
applied to any language.

In terms of providing access to external libraries, I'd take this
route over the distributed Erlang protocol.
_______________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list

http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160831/7bfde1e0/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list