[erlang-questions] plists:foreach performances

[Felix Gallo]

not sure which plist you're using, but the one that I could find looked not
entirely erlang-idiomatic; it tried to manage the process scheduling
itself, perhaps as a test implementation of the way that other languages
might do it.

Here's how I might tackle that problem in pure erlang.

https://gist.github.com/anonymous/94ace7cd94fd5930f3e4

F.

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Caragea Silviu <silviu.cpp@REDACTED>
wrote:

> No ,
>
> I have a function:
>
> tt(X)->
>     Fun = fun(_X) ->
>         ok
>           end,
>
>     List = lists:seq(1, X),
>     plists:foreach(Fun, List).
>
> and I'm calling this one : module:tt(130000).
>
> Silviu
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Boroska András <andras.boroska@REDACTED>
> wrote:
>
>> Do you run this in the interactive shell? In that case put it in a module
>> and compile it.
>>
>> Measuring anything in the shell is not relevant.
>>
>> Andras
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20160310/f8e91621/attachment.htm>