[erlang-questions] Announcing Erlang.org Code of Conduct
Mon Mar 16 13:17:22 CET 2015
A CoC smells like the formalised "Common Value System" that all
school children in Sweden has to accept (in writing) and discuss
in "Common Value System" events (taking up to two days) each year.
Klacke says that it develops their bullshit detector to a fine
tuned instrument. Lets hope so.
On 2015-03-16 10:56, Thomas Lindgren wrote:
> Hi Gordon, do recall, however, that this is a mailing list, not a
> booze up in Edinburgh.
> I'm concerned because most of this seems to be driven not by real
> needs due to eternal flame wars and off topic malformed posting on
> this mailing list, but by holier-than-thou posturing in Silicon
> Valley. The mere fact that you are mentioning "doxxing" and "swatting"
> gives things a very, shall we say, contemporary american feel.
> What's worse is this sort of policing has already deprived or
> attempted to deprive several technical projects of key contributors
> (example 1: Ben Noordhuis in node.js). I find such a development
> frankly deplorable and a sign that the field is turning from
> technology into petty (but vicious) politics.
> I would for these reasons strongly prefer not to introduce this sort
> of policy. I am, of course, ready and willing to be banned for my
> potentially insensitive, hateful, oppressive (etc) statements -- fire
> away, moderators.
> On Monday, March 16, 2015 8:53 AM, Gordon Guthrie <>
> I'm glad the Erlang Community is thinking about a CoC - and I
> thought I would explain why.
> We started thinking about it in Edinburgh a couple of years ago.
> A lot of my friends and colleagues are Rubyists and the Ruby
> community always thought of itself as 'nice' and 'welcoming' but,
> like many other communities, built the social side of the
> community around drink.
> Then at one event a female engineer was sexually assaulted in
> public by her manager, after drink taken. This had a spiral of
> consequences that ended up with her leaving the industry - and
> (much less importantly) left the community in shock.
> At this point we started reviewing how we did things. Did we
> organise events with 'compulsory drinking'? Yes we did. Turns out
> a fair number of people (not just women) find find packs of drunk
> engineers unwelcoming.
> I have organised 3 Fringe conferences at the Turing Festival, a
> couple of Erlang Factory Lights, blah-blah-blah over the years -
> and at all of them I assumed 'be nice' was enough.
> Some things came out of the woodwork. There's a prominent
> drinks/networking meetup in London that I have attended a couple
> of times. A female engineering acquaintance said she wouldn't go
> to it be she'd been groped in public there and told the organisers
> and they did nothing.
> Other stuff emerges (not about Erlang events, but who knows):
> * top tips for elevator pitches, never go in an elevator with a VC
> * female speakers being jumped on by other speakers after he said
> "come up to the room and I'll give you a copy of my book"
> And in all of them, the point is that the assaulters were
> continuing on the scene, going to events, invited as speakers.
> At that point you start thinking "all my events were fine, weren't
> they?" and the answer is "I don't know".
> That's what a code of conduct for events is for. You want all your
> attendees to come forward and report problems and know that you
> will take them seriously and deal with it.
> You don't write a supervision tree for the sake of the processes
> that don't crash - something will go wrong and you need to have a
> protocol in place.
> But its not just codes of conduct.
> Started looking at other things like T-shirts. We all knock out
> swag t-shirts. Turns out women won't wear boxy 'unisex' t-shirts
> except as pyjamas - and they won't were t-shirts with slogans
> across the breast.
> As part of the Mostly Functional conference I was working on an
> cheery to have a t-shirt that had across the chest:
> ./rebar make_luvv
> Needless to say when I asked female friends about it they pointed
> out it was an unwearable perv magnet - walking invitation to
> creeps. Erk! Scrapped that plan and that t-shirt.
> We produce conference swag that is unwearable by female members of
> our community - not really welcoming.
> So Edinburgh is moving towards:
> * codes of conducts at TechMeetup and Turing
> * moving away from 'compulsory drinking' and making soft drinks
> * fixing swag
> * reaching out to women speakers, other ignored groups and first
> time speakers
> We will be doing that this year at the Beam Me Up Scott.ie
> conference at Turing
> And that's a good thing.
> We've all seen the horrors that have been unfolding towards
> prominent women in tech, particularly on Twitter, the last 6
> months, with death and rape threats, doxxing and swatting.
> I don't think people on this list were taking part in that, or
> that harassment happens - but I would be happier if we made a
> collective statement that we have processes in place and the
> commitment to follow them through.
> My elderly parents clip newspaper articles about technology and
> give them to me. So last week, that was the clipping I got - about
> how my industry was a gynocidal shit pit. That doesn't make me
> feel good.
> And if my parents know about it, there can't be a sinner on earth
> who doesn't share that opinion.
> Just my 2c
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Benoit Chesneau
> < <mailto:>> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:25 PM Fred Hebert <
> <mailto:>> wrote:
> On 03/13, Loïc Hoguin wrote:
> > I see little need for a code of conduct that basically
> says "be nice". It's
> > common sense after all.
> Then the code of conduct shall not be a problem for you.
> What the code does, however, is put a context around when
> and how
> someone can be reprimanded on the list, and for what
> reasons. It also
> gives a path of escalation in case of disagreement.
> Without one, this is
> basically left implicit to whoever is swinging the
> banhammer, and who
> you know or can talk to.
> It sets expectations and context over what is expected
> from members
> *and* from moderators.
> > > It is pointless to send a message that only warns
> about posting style.
> > > If you are trying to point someone to correct posting
> > > guidelines, please do so while at least honestly
> attempting to answer
> > > their questions or comments. It is generally unhelpful
> to give only a
> > > warning related to posting style, as newcomers may
> feel unwelcome,
> > > only to leave. And that is exactly what we do not want.
> > That's what you'll inevitably get now that you made a
> number of official
> > "rules" for posting style. And you'll also get the
> associated frame wars
> > about top and bottom posting.
> Then it goes against the code of conduct, please don't do
> Moderation can do its job, as subtle as it may be to the
> onlooker, or
> you can brin your problems to the moderators. Their
> contact info is
> listed in the code of conduct.
> Regarding top or bottom posting, I don't have strong
> feelings either
> way, though I do get annoyed by gmail users never
> filtering down the
> quoted part of posts yielding exponentially larger threads
> when you use
> a client that doesn't fold quotes.
> Why do we need a code of conduct now when we lived without it
> for so long? Also since we are speaking of a community
> who/when was discussed that document? Where can I find a list
> of the moderators?
> Also i agree discouraging people to not do top posting when
> most modern client use it as a default sounds weird and not
> very welcoming for the new generation...
> - benoit
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions