[erlang-questions] json to map

Richard A. O'Keefe ok@REDACTED
Mon Aug 31 02:27:23 CEST 2015


On 29/08/2015, at 11:56 pm, <ok@REDACTED> <ok@REDACTED> wrote:
> knowing what the characters were.  It's like the way in Pascal
> "[" and "(*" were different *character sequences* but the same
> *token*.

What nonsense!  "(*" is equivalent (6.1.8) to "{", not "[".
The equivalent of "[" is "(." (6.1.9), not "(*".

This howler doesn't invalidate the main point.




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list