[erlang-questions] Unable to call functions that are in a module in the same location

[Gustavo Pires]

You shouldn't be using the record #actuator instead of #sensor in
xor_mimic(actuators)? There is a error in construct_Cortex because of this

xor_mimic(sensors) ->
  [#sensor{name = xor_GetInput, scape = {private, xor_sim}, vl = 2}];
xor_mimic(actuators) ->
  [#sensor{name = xor_SendOutput, scape = {private, xor_sim}, vl = 1}].


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Yves S. Garret <yoursurrogategod@REDACTED>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I completely forgot about this problem.
>
> Here are some more files that will hopefully get rid of some of the
> confusion:
> records.hrl:
> http://textsnip.com/a148rx
> polis.erl:
> http://textsnip.com/bk8xao
> morphology.erl:
> http://textsnip.com/8rlag9
> genotype.erl:
> http://textsnip.com/ax1n49
>
> Let me know if there's anything else that I can hopefully shed light on.
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Gustavo Pires <devgutt@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> Where's the code of construct_Agent(Specie_Id, Agent_Id, SpecCon)? You
>> only sent construct_Cortex. Probably the problem is there.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Strong <steve@REDACTED> wrote:
>>
>>>  The record will be initialised with the defaults as specified in the
>>> hrl.  The code and stacktrace in the gist still suggest that
>>> SpecCon#constraint.morphology is ‘undefined’ - so something between the
>>> record construction below and the crash within the gist must be modifying
>>> the record.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve Strong
>>> Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
>>>
>>>  On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 15:36, Yves S. Garret wrote:
>>>
>>> The record in question is "constraint".  The thing is, when I call it,
>>> it looks like this with none of the values initialized:
>>>
>>> test() ->
>>>   Specie_Id = test,
>>>   Agent_Id = test,
>>>   CloneAgent_Id = test_clone,
>>>   SpecCon = #constraint{}, % <---- HERE IS WHERE THE FIRST INSTANCE IS
>>> CREATED
>>>   F = fun() ->
>>>     construct_Agent(Specie_Id, Agent_Id, SpecCon),
>>>     clone_Agent(Specie_Id, CloneAgent_Id),
>>>     print(Agent_Id),
>>>     print(CloneAgent_Id),
>>>     delete_Agent(Agent_Id),
>>>     delete_Agent(CloneAgent_Id)
>>>   end,
>>>
>>>   mnesia:transaction(F).
>>>
>>> My question is thus, if I make a record with #constraint{}, does that
>>> mean that all of its values are by default set to undefined or the default
>>> values that were specified in records.hrl?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Steve Strong <steve@REDACTED>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm guessing that this:
>>>
>>>   Morphology = SpecCon#constraint.morphology,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is setting Morphology to 'undefined' - that's what the stack trace looks
>>> to be saying.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 16 Aug 2014, at 04:54, "Yves S. Garret" <yoursurrogategod@REDACTED>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This is my code:
>>> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/5b9b2c55a7684f5386e2
>>>
>>> When I run my code inside of erlang (17.0), this is the error that I get:
>>> 7> genotype:create_test().
>>> {aborted,{undef,[{morphology,undefined,[sensors],[]},
>>>                  {morphology,get_InitSensors,1,
>>>                              [{file,"morphology.erl"},{line,8}]},
>>>                  {genotype,construct_Cortex,3,
>>>                            [{file,"genotype.erl"},{line,41}]},
>>>                  {genotype,construct_Agent,3,
>>>                            [{file,"genotype.erl"},{line,20}]},
>>>                  {genotype,'-create_test/0-fun-0-',0,
>>>                            [{file,"genotype.erl"},{line,434}]},
>>>
>>> {mnesia_tm,apply_fun,3,[{file,"mnesia_tm.erl"},{line,833}]},
>>>                  {mnesia_tm,execute_transaction,5,
>>>                             [{file,"mnesia_tm.erl"},{line,813}]},
>>>
>>> {erl_eval,do_apply,6,[{file,"erl_eval.erl"},{line,661}]}]}}
>>>
>>> genotype.erl and morphology.erl are in the directory, so why can't
>>> genotype's function call morphology's functions?  Or am I missing something
>>> else entirely?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140904/a5a72870/attachment.htm>