[erlang-questions] Unable to call functions that are in a module in the same location
Yves S. Garret
yoursurrogategod@REDACTED
Thu Sep 4 02:43:34 CEST 2014
Hello,
I completely forgot about this problem.
Here are some more files that will hopefully get rid of some of the
confusion:
records.hrl:
http://textsnip.com/a148rx
polis.erl:
http://textsnip.com/bk8xao
morphology.erl:
http://textsnip.com/8rlag9
genotype.erl:
http://textsnip.com/ax1n49
Let me know if there's anything else that I can hopefully shed light on.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Gustavo Pires <devgutt@REDACTED> wrote:
> Where's the code of construct_Agent(Specie_Id, Agent_Id, SpecCon)? You
> only sent construct_Cortex. Probably the problem is there.
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Strong <steve@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> The record will be initialised with the defaults as specified in the
>> hrl. The code and stacktrace in the gist still suggest that
>> SpecCon#constraint.morphology is ‘undefined’ - so something between the
>> record construction below and the crash within the gist must be modifying
>> the record.
>>
>> --
>> Steve Strong
>> Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
>>
>> On Sunday, 17 August 2014 at 15:36, Yves S. Garret wrote:
>>
>> The record in question is "constraint". The thing is, when I call it, it
>> looks like this with none of the values initialized:
>>
>> test() ->
>> Specie_Id = test,
>> Agent_Id = test,
>> CloneAgent_Id = test_clone,
>> SpecCon = #constraint{}, % <---- HERE IS WHERE THE FIRST INSTANCE IS
>> CREATED
>> F = fun() ->
>> construct_Agent(Specie_Id, Agent_Id, SpecCon),
>> clone_Agent(Specie_Id, CloneAgent_Id),
>> print(Agent_Id),
>> print(CloneAgent_Id),
>> delete_Agent(Agent_Id),
>> delete_Agent(CloneAgent_Id)
>> end,
>>
>> mnesia:transaction(F).
>>
>> My question is thus, if I make a record with #constraint{}, does that
>> mean that all of its values are by default set to undefined or the default
>> values that were specified in records.hrl?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Steve Strong <steve@REDACTED> wrote:
>>
>> I'm guessing that this:
>>
>> Morphology = SpecCon#constraint.morphology,
>>
>>
>> Is setting Morphology to 'undefined' - that's what the stack trace looks
>> to be saying.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 16 Aug 2014, at 04:54, "Yves S. Garret" <yoursurrogategod@REDACTED>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is my code:
>> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/5b9b2c55a7684f5386e2
>>
>> When I run my code inside of erlang (17.0), this is the error that I get:
>> 7> genotype:create_test().
>> {aborted,{undef,[{morphology,undefined,[sensors],[]},
>> {morphology,get_InitSensors,1,
>> [{file,"morphology.erl"},{line,8}]},
>> {genotype,construct_Cortex,3,
>> [{file,"genotype.erl"},{line,41}]},
>> {genotype,construct_Agent,3,
>> [{file,"genotype.erl"},{line,20}]},
>> {genotype,'-create_test/0-fun-0-',0,
>> [{file,"genotype.erl"},{line,434}]},
>>
>> {mnesia_tm,apply_fun,3,[{file,"mnesia_tm.erl"},{line,833}]},
>> {mnesia_tm,execute_transaction,5,
>> [{file,"mnesia_tm.erl"},{line,813}]},
>>
>> {erl_eval,do_apply,6,[{file,"erl_eval.erl"},{line,661}]}]}}
>>
>> genotype.erl and morphology.erl are in the directory, so why can't
>> genotype's function call morphology's functions? Or am I missing something
>> else entirely?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140903/1c20d0c6/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list