[erlang-questions] ct_netconfc.erl: is this the expected behavior or is it a bug?

Siri Hansen <>
Wed Mar 12 12:03:11 CET 2014


You can not do that with ct_netconfc:edit_config/3. If you want to alter
the 'config' element you must use ct_netconfc:send_rpc (and specify the
edit-config element with all it's contents) or ct_netconfc:send (if you
want to specify the complete rpc message).

/siri


2014-03-12 11:20 GMT+01:00 Alexander Poulikakos <
>:

> > So in this example, it doesn't matter where you define your "xc"
> > prefix; you can put in on any element above the element where it is
> used, e.g., any of <elementC>, <elementB>, <ElementA>, <config>,
> <edit-config>, or <rpc>.
>
> How can I define the "xc" prefix on the <config> element with
> ct_netconfc:edit_config/3 function?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140312/c9d25f11/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list