[erlang-questions] Difference between enif_schedule_dirty_nif and driver_async?
Sat Jun 21 16:42:53 CEST 2014
depending on the communication patterns you have between your Erlang and C
code, I wouldn't rule out the simple external port approach. It has the
benefit of not polluting your Erlang VM with problems ;-) and is probably
the easiest to implement.
On Jun 21, 2014 1:40 PM, "Max Lapshin" <max.lapshin@REDACTED> wrote:
> I'm doing very CPU bound task: video transcoding.
> What is better to use: dirty NIF or driver async?
> Is it correct to ask "what is better" in this case?
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions