[erlang-questions] Difference between enif_schedule_dirty_nif and driver_async?

Robert Raschke rtrlists@REDACTED
Sat Jun 21 16:42:53 CEST 2014

Hi Max,

depending on the communication patterns you have between your Erlang and C
code, I wouldn't rule out the simple external port approach. It has the
benefit of not polluting your Erlang VM with problems ;-) and is probably
the easiest to implement.

 On Jun 21, 2014 1:40 PM, "Max Lapshin" <max.lapshin@REDACTED> wrote:

> I'm doing very CPU bound task: video transcoding.
> What is better to use: dirty NIF or driver async?
> Is it correct to ask "what is better" in this case?
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140621/e579e712/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list