[erlang-questions] Time for OTP to be Renamed?
Vance Shipley
vances@REDACTED
Sun Feb 16 11:40:38 CET 2014
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:06:08AM +0100, Joacim Grebenö wrote:
} I would only use the gen_server iff I needed hot code loading/upgrading.
} In the real world, and in the majority of cases, that seldom is needed.
}
} IMHO and within my experience of course.
Lest other, less experienced, readers get the impression that it is that
simple let me just provide this pointer:
http://www.erlang.org/doc/design_principles/spec_proc.html
To write a program which will work (properly) in an OTP compliant system,
you must receive and handle a number of system messages. Without OTP
compliance you have no supervision, debugging, release handling, observer
and I don't know what else. You are free to do so but I wouldn't recommend
this route for anyone else who hasn't mastered the environment.
--
-Vance
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list