[erlang-questions] FW: Version numbering scheme change and the implication / Re: [ANN] Erlang/OTP 17.0-rc1 has been released.
Thu Feb 13 14:11:02 CET 2014
Re: otp_version: In addition to
erlang:system_info(otp_correction_package), a corresponding flag
"otp_version" - similar to [emulator] "version" - is going to be added
to the erl command, in order to allow the extraction of the complete
version number from command line tools. Other additions to extract the
Erlang/OTP version have not been planned.
Re: 17.0.0 =?= 17.0: Yes, they are the same. We could have used the
extra ".0", but we chose not to.
Andreas Schumacher, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vlad Dumitrescu [mailto:]
> Sent: den 13 februari 2014 10:35
> To: Andreas Schumacher
> Cc: Anthony Ramine; erlang-questions; Rickard Green
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Version numbering scheme change and the implication / Re: [ANN] Erlang/OTP 17.0-rc1 has been released.
> A couple of more questions about versins:
> - how can we find the otp_version without starting erlang? otp_release is in the start scripts, but I can't find anywhere "17.0-rc1"...
> - is 17.0.0 the same as 17.0? Is it a problem to use the extra ".0"?
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Andreas Schumacher <> wrote:
>> From the versioning clarification mail that I sent on behalf of the
>> OTP team to the list on February 7:
>> "The new version scheme is *not* semantic versioning; although, it has
>> been inspired by it. We do not want to use semantic versioning (as
>> defined by
>> http://semver.org/) out of the box since it does not fit our needs."
>> Andreas Schumacher
>> Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> [mailto:] On Behalf Of Anthony
>>> Sent: den 12 februari 2014 02:48
>>> To: Rickard Green
>>> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Version numbering scheme change and
>>> the implication / Re: [ANN] Erlang/OTP 17.0-rc1 has been released.
>>> So OTP won't follow semantic versioning, right?
>>> Just seeking confirmation about semver.
>>> Anthony Ramine
>>> Le 12 févr. 2014 à 00:43, Rickard Green <> a écrit :
>>>> As of OTP 17 we drop this patch level number sequence and start
>>>> using one set of patch level numbers per release. The patch level is
>>>> not expressed as an integer as it used to be, but instead as a
>>>> version number <X>.<Y>.<Z>[.<N> ...], for example, 17.0.1. This way
>>>> the patch level gives you a bit more information. You can for
>>>> example see directly which OTP release it applies to. This patch
>>>> level version number also replace the -<X> tar-ball naming scheme.
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions