[erlang-questions] Controversial subject of the day: tabs and spaces for indentation

Lukas Larsson lukas@REDACTED
Thu Feb 6 10:41:06 CET 2014

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@REDACTED>wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Lukas Larsson <lukas@REDACTED> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:
>>> Plus this doesn't help your code get merged at all. If you submit code
>>> with broken whitespace, then tools will also display this whitespace
>>> change. You can of course hide whitespace changes, but the problem is that
>>> whitespace does matter in some places, so you're basically hiding
>>> potentially important information by doing that.
>>> This is in my opinion the reason why it would be a very bad thing to do
>> a huge commit that changes the current whitespace format of a project to
>> another. It is already very hard to figure out what change could have
>> caused a bug without having to deal with whitespace changes in the middle
>> of a diff.
> well then commit a whitespace change diff, then the change you really
> wanted to make. It of course requires to have a standard defined at first :)
> For single commits this would work, but will not work when I want to do
"git diff OTP_R14B03..OTP_17.0-rc1"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140206/92c1eea8/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list