[erlang-questions] "erlang-src" package upgrade breaks "syntax_tools" and rebar builds

[Karolis Petrauskas]

Hi,

Yes I am on 64 bits. Thanks, it works fine now!

Karolis

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Karol Urbanski
<karol.urbanski@REDACTED> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are you on 64 bits? It looks like there was a problem building the
> repository indexes for saucy64. I've just rebuilt them, hopefully that
> fixes your issue.
>
> Best regards,
> Karol Urbanski
>
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 01:47:56PM +0200, Karolis Petrauskas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I still have problems using erlang package provided by esl. I am using
>> Kubuntu 13.10 and have the following line in
>> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/erlang-solutions.list:
>>
>>     deb http://binaries.erlang-solutions.com/debian saucy contrib
>>
>> When running `sudo apt-get install erlang-src` I'm getting:
>>
>>     The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>>      erlang-src : Depends: erlang-base (>= 1:16.b.3-3) but 1:16.b.3 is
>> to be installed or
>>                            erlang-base-hipe (>= 1:16.b.3-3)
>>
>> The command `sudo apt-get install --reinstall erlang-base` installs
>> "erlang-base 1:16.b.3".
>>
>> I have cleaned by apt cache and updated the apt sources.
>>
>> Karolis
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Karol Urbanski
>> <karol.urbanski@REDACTED> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 02:27:22PM +0000, Roger Lipscombe wrote:
>> >> "The esl-erlang package is a file containg the complete installation:
>> >> it includes the Erlang/OTP platform and all of its applications. The
>> >> erlang package is a frontend to a number of smaller packages.
>> >> Currently we support both erlang and esl-erlang."
>> >>
>> >> I've just done another "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade", and there's
>> >> a whole heap of new packages (1:16.b.3-3), which appear to have fixed
>> >> the problem; so it looks like I got caught mid-push, or the version
>> >> number got messed up earlier.
>> >>
>> >> Either way, it all seems good now.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Roger.
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > we had a small mixup with the version numbers due to rushing the patch
>> > release. I'm glad to hear it works fine now, and sorry for the
>> > inconvenience!
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Karol Urbanski
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > erlang-questions mailing list
>> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions