[erlang-questions] 0MQ libraries

[Pieter Hintjens]

Yes, if there is a connection break, there can be lost data (as far as
I'm aware). If applications need guarantees of delivery in such cases,
they layer those on top using a variety of mechanisms, which depend on
the type of work being done.

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Jesper Louis Andersen
<jesper.louis.andersen@REDACTED> wrote:
> Like Erik writes, you don't know how what you lost. At best you can try to
> mitigate it. It is definitely one of the things I would ask Pieter about how
> he solves in C/C++.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Garrett Smith <g@REDACTED> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Andreas Schultz <aschultz@REDACTED>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> Yes - Google didn't suggest this.
>> >>
>> >> Did anybody do any performance measurements on this?
>> >
>> > Not yet, didn't have time for it :-(
>>
>> I don't know if this is helpful or not to the question of
>> benchmarking, but I've created a very simple behavior to compare
>> erlang-czmq with erlzmq:
>>
>> https://github.com/gar1t/erlang-czmq/blob/master/src/zmq_gen_benchmark.erl
>>
>> There are two flavors of this - one for each library being benchmarked:
>>
>> https://github.com/gar1t/erlang-czmq/blob/master/src/erlzmq_benchmark.erl
>>
>> https://github.com/gar1t/erlang-czmq/blob/master/src/czmq_benchmark.erl
>>
>> In your Berlin workshop (tempted to travel for this :), if this topic
>> comes up, maybe this could be helpful to run some quick tests. I'm
>> very happy to help with this in any way!
>>
>> Garrett
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
>
>
> --
> J.
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>