[erlang-questions] 0MQ libraries

Jesper Louis Andersen <>
Sat Feb 1 23:23:02 CET 2014


Like Erik writes, you don't know how what you lost. At best you can try to
mitigate it. It is definitely one of the things I would ask Pieter about
how he solves in C/C++.


On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Garrett Smith <> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Andreas Schultz <>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Yes - Google didn't suggest this.
> >>
> >> Did anybody do any performance measurements on this?
> >
> > Not yet, didn't have time for it :-(
>
> I don't know if this is helpful or not to the question of
> benchmarking, but I've created a very simple behavior to compare
> erlang-czmq with erlzmq:
>
> https://github.com/gar1t/erlang-czmq/blob/master/src/zmq_gen_benchmark.erl
>
> There are two flavors of this - one for each library being benchmarked:
>
> https://github.com/gar1t/erlang-czmq/blob/master/src/erlzmq_benchmark.erl
>
> https://github.com/gar1t/erlang-czmq/blob/master/src/czmq_benchmark.erl
>
> In your Berlin workshop (tempted to travel for this :), if this topic
> comes up, maybe this could be helpful to run some quick tests. I'm
> very happy to help with this in any way!
>
> Garrett
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>



-- 
J.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140201/ea836c1d/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list