[erlang-questions] Erlang make out
Mon Apr 14 02:08:26 CEST 2014
Java has: Maven, Ant, Ivy, and a host of IDEs that over the years had
integrated build tools.
Ruby has (not compiled!): Rake, Thor, mkmf, and many not-so-notable others.
I don't there are as many technical decisions involved as human ones:
people like to work in different ways.
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:43 AM, <lloyd@REDACTED> wrote:
> A heap of Googling and a recent thread on Erlang Questions suggests that
> there is little unanimity on the best way to organize and make large
> (multiple application) Erlang systems--- Erlang make, GNU make, Sinan,
> Rebar, erlang.mk, erl.mk, yada, yada. Enough to give a noob a colossal
> Two questions:
> 1) Is this a matter of reinventing the wheel? Or are there sound technical
> reasons for so many options?
> 2) Is there an emerging consensus?
> erlang-questions mailing list
Sean Cribbs <sean@REDACTED>
Basho Technologies, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions