[erlang-questions] Erlang make out

[Sean Cribbs]

Java has: Maven, Ant, Ivy, and a host of IDEs that over the years had
integrated build tools.
Ruby has (not compiled!): Rake, Thor, mkmf, and many not-so-notable others.

I don't there are as many technical decisions involved as human ones:
people like to work in different ways.


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:43 AM, <lloyd@REDACTED> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> A heap of Googling and a recent thread on Erlang Questions suggests that
> there is little unanimity on the best way to organize and make large
> (multiple application) Erlang systems--- Erlang make, GNU make, Sinan,
> Rebar, erlang.mk, erl.mk, yada, yada. Enough to give a noob a colossal
> headache.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Is this a matter of reinventing the wheel? Or are there sound technical
> reasons for so many options?
>
> 2) Is there an emerging consensus?
>
> Thanks,
>
> LRP
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>



-- 
Sean Cribbs <sean@REDACTED>
Software Engineer
Basho Technologies, Inc.
http://basho.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20140413/c95560bd/attachment.htm>