[erlang-questions] Did Erlang's grammar change in R16A?

Anthony Ramine <>
Thu Feb 14 23:41:07 CET 2013


It needs a lot of refactoring now that UTF-8 atoms are out,
but I'll probably do it that when I have some time.

Regards,

-- 
Anthony Ramine

Le 14 févr. 2013 à 23:23, Loïc Hoguin a écrit :

> On 02/14/2013 11:18 PM, Björn-Egil Dahlberg wrote:
>> * Creating atoms in runtime. It should only have been allowed in code
>> and never by list_to_atom/1 or binary_to_atom/1,2 (binary_to_term would
>> still be a thing though)
> 
> Anthony Ramine has a "split the atoms" implementation of ROK's EEP in progress which allows to dynamically create garbage-collected atoms, fixing all issues related to creating them at runtime. You might want to take a look or help getting this in quicker:
> 
>  https://github.com/nox/otp/tree/eep20
> 
> -- 
> Loïc Hoguin
> Erlang Cowboy
> Nine Nines
> http://ninenines.eu
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list