[erlang-questions] Did Erlang's grammar change in R16A?

Loïc Hoguin <>
Thu Feb 14 23:23:59 CET 2013

On 02/14/2013 11:18 PM, Björn-Egil Dahlberg wrote:
> * Creating atoms in runtime. It should only have been allowed in code
> and never by list_to_atom/1 or binary_to_atom/1,2 (binary_to_term would
> still be a thing though)

Anthony Ramine has a "split the atoms" implementation of ROK's EEP in 
progress which allows to dynamically create garbage-collected atoms, 
fixing all issues related to creating them at runtime. You might want to 
take a look or help getting this in quicker:


Loïc Hoguin
Erlang Cowboy
Nine Nines

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list