[erlang-questions] Did Erlang's grammar change in R16A?
Loïc Hoguin
essen@REDACTED
Thu Feb 14 23:23:59 CET 2013
On 02/14/2013 11:18 PM, Björn-Egil Dahlberg wrote:
> * Creating atoms in runtime. It should only have been allowed in code
> and never by list_to_atom/1 or binary_to_atom/1,2 (binary_to_term would
> still be a thing though)
Anthony Ramine has a "split the atoms" implementation of ROK's EEP in
progress which allows to dynamically create garbage-collected atoms,
fixing all issues related to creating them at runtime. You might want to
take a look or help getting this in quicker:
https://github.com/nox/otp/tree/eep20
--
Loïc Hoguin
Erlang Cowboy
Nine Nines
http://ninenines.eu
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list