[erlang-questions] Pmods, packages, Unicode source code and column numbers in compiler - what will happen in R16?
Thu Oct 18 16:29:37 CEST 2012
On 10/16/2012 04:13 PM, Fred Hebert wrote:
> Happy with all measures. I think the balance you strike for
> parametrized modules is also pretty good.
> Quick question -- I remember older posts relative to tuple calls about
> how their implementation somehow limited future optimizations that
> could have been possible. Does it mean their support for Pmod
> utilization means further optimizations will be cancelled?
Well, the apply instruction will need to handle it - there is an extra
branch that cannot be removed :(
> Otherwise, it's good to be stripping stuff from Erlang. The less
> complex, the better.
> Congrats on the good decisions (unless someone proves otherwise! ;) )
> On 12-10-16 9:51 AM, Patrik Nyblom wrote:
>> Hi all!
>> The OTP Technical board decisions from last Thursday are now
>> published on the erlang.org website, which means that the answers to
>> some questions about changes in R16 are finally officially answered.
>> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions