[erlang-questions] RB and remote shells
Fri Oct 5 09:37:27 CEST 2012
I see the issue, my question was more about if it would make sense to
change the behavior of rb to have more sensible defaults, for example
by inheriting the group leader of the process starting it?
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk@REDACTED> wrote:
> Because remote node's rb_sever is started using that node's supervision tree
> thus inheriting a group leader on that node. When it prints stuff out, it
> gets routed to that remote group leader as opposed to your local group
> leader that can print stuff out on your local terminal.
> Hope this makes sense.
> On Thursday, October 4, 2012 5:33:58 AM UTC-7, Ali Sabil wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I have been using rb in a remote shell, and I am wondering why do I
>> have to go through changing the group leader of the rb_server as
>> described here:
>> Are there any plans or idea on how to fix this behavior?
>> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions