[erlang-questions] Frames proposal

Max Lapshin <>
Tue May 1 07:43:47 CEST 2012


On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Richard O'Keefe <> wrote:
>
> {}      is already an empty TUPLE,
> {a:f()} already means a tuple whose one element
>        is the value of a call to the f() function

Yes, I see. It is a pity =(



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list