[erlang-questions] How do funs work ?
Hynek Vychodil
hynek@REDACTED
Wed Mar 28 13:01:26 CEST 2012
I think it should be
F2 = fun() -> 9 + 10 +
fun() -> 7 + 8 +
fun() -> 5 + 6 +
fun() -> 3 + 4 +
fun() -> 1 + 2 +
fun() -> 0 end()
end()
end()
end()
end()
end.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Yoshihiro Tanaka <hirotnkg@REDACTED> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a function which returns fun as below:
>
> make_fun(_, [], F) -> F;
> make_fun(Operator, [Operand1, Operand2|Operands], F) ->
> F2 = case Operator of
> plus -> fun() -> Operand1 + Operand2 + F() end;
> minus -> fun() -> Operand1 - Operand2 + F() end
> end,
> make_fun(Operator, Operands, F2).
>
> When I call it as:
> F1 = make_fun(plus, lists:seq(1,10), fun() -> 0 end).
>
> Is F1 same as F2 below ?
> F2 = fun() -> 1 + 2 +
> fun() -> 3 + 4 +
> fun() -> 5 + 6 +
> fun() -> 7 + 8 +
> fun() -> 9 + 10 +
> fun() -> 0 end()
> end()
> end()
> end()
> end()
> end.
>
>
> Also, is there any difference between funs that are defined at runtime
> and funs that are defined at compile time in terms of how they are
> executed ?
>
> Thank you
> Yoshihiro
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
--
Hynek Vychodil
BI consultant
GoodData
náměstí 28. října 1104/17, 602 00, Brno - Černá Pole
Office: +420 530 50 7704
E-mail: hynek@REDACTED
Web: www.gooddata.com
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list