[erlang-questions] Erlang is the best choice for building commercial application servers
Wed Mar 14 05:36:00 CET 2012
According to this blog, Akka seems better /close performance when compared
".... Erlang R14B04 did *1 million* messages per second while Akka
2.0-SNAPSHOT did *2.1 million* per second..."
this one also has some interesting results:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Miles Fidelman
> Maybe this is obvious, but seems to me that running a concurrency engine
> on top of a JVM just adds a layer of unnecessary overhead.
> Ngoc Dao wrote:
>> The result of Erlang vs Java is obvious.
>> But how about Erlang vs Scala (with Akka, http://akka.io/)?
>> Joe pointed to a very important fact, Java/J2ee is industry (so is c# and
>>> .net) but Erlnag is a language.
>>> Each time I have to look at a WSDL or XML schema to fix a production
>>> in a J2ee application is I ask why Erlang shouldn't be industry? Just
>>> compare the simplicity and in particular the beauty of distributed Erlang
>>> with awkwardness of webservice / JMS communications. Quite frankly folks,
>>> they are really ugly! So are their .net siblings. This is not because I
>>> Erlang, I just follow the same sense of beauty that guided mathematicians
>>> and theoretical physicists for years when they come up with innovative
>>> ideas. As Hardy used to say "There is no place for ugly mathematics".
>>> Why IT
>>> is missing (or ignoring) such a sense? I don't think what we do is more
>>> abstract than pure math (Manifold theory for instance). Maybe because IT
>>> too young but still we need to start sometime from somewhere.
>> erlang-questions mailing list
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions