[erlang-questions] Looking for a stable Protocol Buffers implementation.

Alex Arnon alex.arnon@REDACTED
Sun Feb 26 20:31:35 CET 2012

Great, thanks!!!

Sent from my iPhone

On 26 Feb 2012, at 18:33, Anthony Molinaro <anthonym@REDACTED> wrote:

> Yeah that's been there since the parser was hand rolled.  It's since been replaced with a leex and yecc based parser.  And I can definitely vouch for its use in production.  I've used it in a B2B application with about 30 different partners for about 2 years, probably totaling a couple trillion requests.
> -Anthony
> On Feb 26, 2012, at 5:15 AM, Alex Arnon <alex.arnon@REDACTED> wrote:
>> This bit in the readme has me worried:
>> "Support for parsing proto files and creating code from it is volatile and should be considered alpha software at best. Please do not use this in production."
>> Outdated doc...?
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> On 26 Feb 2012, at 14:02, Jack Moffitt <jack@REDACTED> wrote:
>>>> I am looking for a production-ready Protocol Buffers implementation for
>>>> Erlang. Which is recommended?
>>> I'd probably use the one that Riak uses:
>>> http://github.com/basho/erlang_protobuffs
>>> jack.
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120226/856a00d7/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list