[erlang-questions] Looking for a stable Protocol Buffers implementation.

Anthony Molinaro anthonym@REDACTED
Sun Feb 26 17:33:30 CET 2012

Yeah that's been there since the parser was hand rolled.  It's since been replaced with a leex and yecc based parser.  And I can definitely vouch for its use in production.  I've used it in a B2B application with about 30 different partners for about 2 years, probably totaling a couple trillion requests.


On Feb 26, 2012, at 5:15 AM, Alex Arnon <alex.arnon@REDACTED> wrote:

> This bit in the readme has me worried:
> "Support for parsing proto files and creating code from it is volatile and should be considered alpha software at best. Please do not use this in production."
> Outdated doc...?
> Sent from my iPhone
> On 26 Feb 2012, at 14:02, Jack Moffitt <jack@REDACTED> wrote:
>>> I am looking for a production-ready Protocol Buffers implementation for
>>> Erlang. Which is recommended?
>> I'd probably use the one that Riak uses:
>> http://github.com/basho/erlang_protobuffs
>> jack.
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120226/e81d967a/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list