[erlang-questions] Misultin EOL

[Jesse Gumm]

Well that is good news to hear that param modules are here to say.

--
Jesse Gumm
Owner, Sigma Star Systems
414.940.4866
www.sigma-star.com
@jessegumm
On Feb 18, 2012 5:14 AM, "Joe Armstrong" <erlang@REDACTED> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, José Valim <jose.valim@REDACTED> wrote:
> >> I'd be keen on simple bridge if the Erlang guys would just come out and
> >> say if they support parameterized modules or not.  If they don't, just
> get
> >> rid of it.  What's the point of having something in a language if it's
> not
> >> going to be supported (but that's a different topic)?
> >>
> >>
> >> I agree that if something is added as an experimental feature, it should
> >> either be graduated or removed as soon as possible, not stay
> experimental
> >> indefinitely.
> >
> >
> > I don't use parameterized modules at all but it would be a pity to see {
> > module, args }:function() go.
>
> It will stay - and be documented to make it official
>
> /Joe
>
>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120218/e52a81c9/attachment.htm>