[erlang-questions] Misultin EOL

Andrew Berman rexxe98@REDACTED
Sat Feb 18 00:05:14 CET 2012

I think a lot of issues with APIs would be solved if we had something
analogous to Java interfaces in Erlang.  Behaviors just don't cut it.  I
want something that is a replica of interfaces.  Then all the Erlang guys
have to do is create the interface and then people can create whatever
implementations they want and I never have to worry about changing my code!

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Tim Watson <watson.timothy@REDACTED>wrote:

> On 17 February 2012 22:49, Jesse Gumm <gumm@REDACTED> wrote:
>> I agree with you about the parameterised modules.  I'm not a big fan
>> of them either (though seeing how it works, I do understand why Rusty
>> went that route), and the deprecation of the tuple modules had me
>> scared for a moment. After that happened, I've been starting to think
>> about a roadmap away from the parameterised modules with
>> simple_bridge.
> I think that's a good idea.
> I would also like to respectfully suggest that api implementations might
> be distributed separately from the api itself, so that I can choose to get
> simple_bridge and simple_bridge_mochiweb (or whatever) but ignore the other
> stuff. Just a suggestion you may wish to consider.
> Cheers,
> Tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120217/650b3d65/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list