[erlang-questions] The future of Erlang and BEAM
Sat Feb 11 17:13:11 CET 2012
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Miles Fidelman
> Radek wrote:
>> Well, I think it depends. It's true that using default concurrency
>> libraries is quite difficult and error prone but as I said before, thare
>> are others which mimics Erlang approach (and do it well, just looking at
>> But, I'm not sure if it's a good idea to run anything massively
>> concurrent on JVM; that's one of reasons I've started this topic.
> The only way to run something massively concurrent on a JVM is to write a
> collection of libraries that would look suspiciously like BEAM. So why
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions