[erlang-questions] The future of Erlang and BEAM

Max Bourinov <>
Sat Feb 11 17:13:11 CET 2012


+1

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Miles Fidelman
<>wrote:

> Radek wrote:
>
>> Well, I think it depends. It's true that using default concurrency
>> libraries is quite difficult and error prone but as I said before, thare
>> are others which mimics Erlang approach (and do it well, just looking at
>> numbers).
>>
>> But, I'm not sure if it's a good idea to run anything massively
>> concurrent on JVM; that's one of reasons I've started this topic.
>>
>
> The only way to run something massively concurrent on a JVM is to write a
> collection of libraries that would look suspiciously like BEAM.  So why
> bother?
>
>
>
> --
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/**listinfo/erlang-questions<http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120211/00478dc4/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list