[erlang-questions] Large-scale Erlang in practice
Tue Feb 7 22:38:25 CET 2012
Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 20:49, Miles Fidelman<mfidelman@REDACTED> wrote:
> I'm starting to think that a smalltalk-like toolset would be great for
> Erlang - browsers, inspectors, etc. for a long-running environment. A lot
> of the pieces already exist, it would seem to be a matter of integration.
> This is something that I have in mind for the future of erlide. It's
> not as easy as it seems, especially as one has to invent new ways to
> present information: for example, overviewing a system with several
> thousands of processes...
Maybe borrow from:
- operations management tools (e.g., as used to monitor lots of servers
and services in a data center), and,
- some of the emerging social network analysis tools and visualizations
(e.g., as used to analyze communications patterns in a social network,
particularly by the intelligence community)
These sort of suggest:
- big picture visualizations of process status and message flows
- browsers and inspectors for drilling down into specific processes,
message flows, specific messages
Of course those are operations management and debugging tools.
Something like a Smalltalk class browser might be nice for editing and
distributing code modules - maybe tied to functions for visualizing and
inspecting where those modules and functions are currently being
instantiated in processes.
Just some random thoughts.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
More information about the erlang-questions