[erlang-questions] Which EEP would you pick as the most important one to implement next?
Fri Aug 31 14:42:05 CEST 2012
> I'm surprised implementing frames is not an EEP. This is definitely the
> most lacking feature of erlang by far.
It would have been, but by the time I was ready to submit it
as one, there was a hard requirement that EEPS be marked up
in a basically undefined formalism, and a number of things I
needed to mark up, I could not figure out how to mark up.
That requirement terminated my contribution to EEPs.
I learned RUNOFF. I learned SCRIBE. I learned Troff. I
learned TeX. I learned LaTeX. I learned Lout. I learned
SGML, HTML, XML, XHTML, ... I'm willing to learn any markup
notation that has a tolerably complete tolerably accurate
manual. Markdown, however, does not.
More information about the erlang-questions