[erlang-questions] Which EEP would you pick as the most important one to implement next?

Rapsey <>
Fri Aug 31 14:28:58 CEST 2012


I'm surprised implementing frames is not an EEP. This is definitely the
most lacking feature of erlang by far.


Sergej

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Dmitry Demeshchuk <>wrote:

> Totally agree with EEP 35, looks like a great addition.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Loïc Hoguin <> wrote:
>
>> On 08/31/2012 11:18 AM, Michael Turner wrote:
>>
>>> Since it seems to A Time for Big Questions on this mailing list.
>>>
>>
>> Sounds useful: http://www.erlang.org/eeps/**eep-0035.html<http://www.erlang.org/eeps/eep-0035.html>
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Hoguin
>> Erlang Cowboy
>> Nine Nines
>> http://ninenines.eu
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> 
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/**listinfo/erlang-questions<http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Dmitry Demeshchuk
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120831/cdbf8a44/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list