[erlang-questions] Erlang with Thrift

Mike Oxford <>
Tue May 24 01:34:16 CEST 2011

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Jack Moffitt <> wrote:

> > If you can get away from Thrift (e.g. no one else is relying on it or
> > you can't talk them off the cliff) I'd stick Erlang terms. BERT is a
> > decent way to let other languages play along, otherwise there are
> > usually language specific Erlang term conversion libraries.
> Speaking of BERT, how are people dealing with the possibility that
> rogue/broken clients might fill up the atom table?
> jack.

Not use atoms anywhere in the protocol?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110523/d4b476d8/attachment.html>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list