[erlang-questions] 'reply-to' header in this mailing list

[Alexander Krasnukhin]

Yes, yes. I've got this. People from telecom will always rely on standards
instead of people expectations. Good. Right. Understandable.

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Raimo Niskanen <
raimo+erlang-questions@REDACTED> wrote:

> Search the archives. Do not waste bandwidth.
>
> The same bottom line as the last time still applies:
>  http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2010-December/055017.html
>
> / Raimo Niskanen, mailing list maintainer at erlang dot org
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 02:03:18PM +0200, Alexander Krasnukhin wrote:
> > Yeah, yeah. I've got this. It is some kind of local joke. Don't have
> > anything to ask? Why not just ask why the hell "reply-to" isn't the
> mailing
> > list address itself?
> >
> > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Mazen Harake <mazen.harake@REDACTED
> >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> http://erlang.2086793.n4.nabble.com/mailing-list-quot-reply-to-quot-td3067987.html
> > >
> > > See David Mercer's response.
> > >
> > > /M
> > >
> > >
> > > On 17 May 2011 13:50, Alexander Krasnukhin <the.malkolm@REDACTED>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I don't want to discuss this. Just wanted to ask why because it is
> unusual
> > >> these days.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Mazen Harake <mazen.harake@REDACTED
> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> This has been debated for as long as mailing lists have been used.
> This
> > >>> is a philosophical question.
> > >>>
> > >>> To shortcut the discussion which will probably develop now: Use
> "reply
> > >>> all".
> > >>>
> > >>> Everyone should learn this. The other way is simply a hack.
> > >>>
> > >>> See: http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.html
> > >>>
> > >>> /M
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 17 May 2011 13:04, Alexander Krasnukhin <the.malkolm@REDACTED
> >wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hej,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Why this mailing list doesn't add itself to the 'reply-to' header? I
> see
> > >>>> it isn't uncommon for subscribers to send message to the author
> directly
> > >>>> instead of the list.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I wonder why?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>> Alexander
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> erlang-questions mailing list
> > >>>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > >>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Alexander
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Alexander
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
> --
>
> / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>



-- 
Regards,
Alexander
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110517/dacd2171/attachment.htm>