[erlang-questions] A PropEr announcement
Wed Jun 15 06:02:55 CEST 2011
I'm wondering about this myself. If I only provide the tests (including the -include_lib line) but not the PropEr code
itself, is it breaking the license? Technically, none of the PropEr code is running in there, only its API.
On 2011-06-14, at 10:13 AM, James Churchman wrote:
> Also is it really the case that the tests could not be distributed, or more a case that it is totally fine to distribute the tests along as the person receiving the tests downloads proper themselves? the code that is not tests would still run fine.
> also +1 to try to convince Kostis to release PropEr with a better license!
More information about the erlang-questions