[erlang-questions] FPGA coming around the corner
jm
jeffm@REDACTED
Fri Jan 7 06:02:02 CET 2011
My simplistic guess is that they are are either
* Unaware of Erlang as a viable option.
* Are looking for a C/C++/Java solution.
* Are looking for a general purpose *high performance* language, eg,
what Fortress is aiming to become.
* Have vested interests, eg are using panic a marketing method to raise
funding.
Jeff.
On 7/01/11 3:40 PM, Edmond Begumisa wrote:
>> If the time is to come, then surely this is the *right time* for the
>> Erlang/OTP 'product' to step up and meet the challenges and mindset
>> that bind us daily owing to the chosen OO style forced onto us by
>> C++/Java.
>
> On a related note: I'm curious -- why is it that many seem unaware of
> Erlang's advantages with multi-core? Even vocal MP experts that are
> advocating for the change in mindset you describe and the need for
> programmers to be aware of the disconnect and quickly adapt -- these
> advocates don't sound like they're aware of Erlang (at least they
> don't mention Erlang in their talks).
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list