[erlang-questions] [ANN] misultin v0.7

[Yurii Rashkovskii]

Roberto,

$ cat misultin_req.erl
-module(misultin_req).
-export([ok/1]).
-record(misultin_req, {req,socket_pid}).

ok(#misultin_req{req = Req}) ->
 io:format("got req: ~p~n",[Req]).

$ erl
Erlang R14B02 (erts-5.8.3) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-
threads:0] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]

Eshell V5.8.3  (abort with ^G)
1> Req = {misultin_req, request_stuff, self()}.
{misultin_req,request_stuff,<0.31.0>}
2> misultin_req:ok(Req).
got req: request_stuff
ok
3> Req:ok().
got req: request_stuff
ok

Roberto Ostinelli wrote:
> hello robert,
>
> i've had similar requests on #erlang and this is definitely on the todo
> list.
>
> i will of course need to support backwards compatibility and i need to spend
> some time in figuring out what is the best way to do so. if you feel like
> sharing any pointers, i'll obviously be very glad to read from you :)
>
> r.
>
>
> 2011/4/12 Robert Virding <robert.virding@REDACTED>
>
> > Roberto,
> >
> > I am only a casual writer of webservers and Misultin has worked well so
> > far. It has been easy to use and has had sufficient features for what I
> > need. BUT couldn't you make a misultin-- without parametrized modules using
> > only standard erlang for us users who prefer classic Erlang? :-)
> >
> > Robert
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions