[erlang-questions] gb_trees, strange behaviour
Sun Nov 7 03:49:55 CET 2010
I definitely agree with that. The same should also be done with ordsets.
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Kostis Sagonas <> wrote:
> Also, in an ideal world, the orddict() type should have been declared
> opaque instead so that tools such as dialyzer complain when finding code
> that creates random lists (like yours) and passes them to a function
> expecting an orddict() instead.
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
> See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> To unsubscribe; mailto:
More information about the erlang-questions