[erlang-questions] Re: Benchmarks

Bob Ippolito <>
Wed Jan 13 04:39:33 CET 2010


What I'm saying is that the more time you have to battle uphill to use
Erlang the bigger the denominator is going to be in that equation. I
didn't have that problem. At the time I chose Erlang there were only
two of us, I didn't have to justify it to anyone but myself. Obviously
no regrets here from me or the team :)

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Henning Diedrich <> wrote:
> Your success delivered an even more convincing argument than any benchmark
> could be.
>
> Bob ! [ Thanks | Congratulations ]
>
> Where you just punning this thread or did you really have to do the
> justifying? Even as CTO & co-founder?
>
> Henning
>
>
> Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>
>> It's much lower if you have to spend hours justifying why Erlang is a
>> better choice than X.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Henning Diedrich <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Accepted on account of today's news.
>>>
>>> What's the number then, Bob?
>>>
>>> Henning
>>>
>>> Steve Davis wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to offer another benchmark:
>>>>
>>>> Net income in dollars generated by the application / hours of
>>>> development and maintenance time.
>>>>
>>>> /s
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________________________________________
>>>> erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
>>>> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________________________________
>>> erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
>>> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list