is the SMALL_MEMORY define deprecated? (no) Why is it only used for VxWorks?
Matthias Lang
matthias@REDACTED
Mon Dec 13 12:49:47 CET 2010
Hi,
I noticed the 'SMALL_MEMORY' define in the emulator source. It's only
ever enabled for vxworks, in sys/vxworks/erl_vxworks_sys.h.
Question 1: is SMALL_MEMORY deprecated? (it's not documented anywhere)
Question 2: is there a known problem using it for non-VxWorks targets?
Question 3: is anyone else using that define on a non-VxWorks system?
I tried it out on my target hardware, a 32-bit MIPS linux system. It
passes my whole test suite and cuts memory use from about 9M to about
8M. Not bad for no effort on my part. I haven't measured performance.
Going through the code, it has these effects:
- Disables all (?) of the optional memory allocators. Similar
(same?) effect can be achieved with +Mea min (erl_alloc.c)
- Sets lower sizes/thresholds for block sizes and parameters in
memory allocators, often half or a quarter. (erl_alloc.c,
erl_alloc_util.h)
- Cuts the timer hash table to 1/3 size. (erl_bif_timer.c)
- Cuts the timing wheel from 256k to 32k (time.c)
- Makes processes more "GC happy". (erl_process.h)
none of that seems scary. Have I missed anything?
Matt
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list